Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

mnemonix · Post by **mnemonix** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 3:03 pm

.308 seemed pretty effective as a deterrent years ago. Seems we already found the solution and moved away from it.

nomad · Post by **nomad** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 3:25 pm

ghound wrote:
Fact is he was desperatley unlucky in my eyes and he was doing nothing that I or most people I know havent done a million times over before. I for one will be considering what I need to change in my behaviour when I am on the water from here on in.

Totally agree Jimmy. Number was up.

Hemi · Post by **Hemi** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 4:13 pm

mnemonix wrote:.308 seemed pretty effective as a deterrent years ago. Seems we already found the solution and moved away from it.

Now now... You know those comments will get in the headlines as a 'rogue fisho '....!
(No matter how true!)

Agent86 · Post by **Agent86** » Mon Jun 23, 2014 6:29 pm

AM wrote:Pretty sure you heard wrong Denis.

Yeah thought that may be the case Andy, just something else someone has said and passed around.

Yeah jimmy, very unlucky, number was up,

Mameishacllu · Post by **Mameishacllu** » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:35 pm

I had mates on that job Matt...was in the boat.

North Australian FISH FINDER TM forums

Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Re: Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Re: Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Re: Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Re: Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?

Re: Has the fatal croc attack changed northern fishing?