Should it proceed?
Already built
Port Melville Submission- Department of the Environment
- STANDY
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 1099
- Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:08 pm
- Location: Darwin
Re: Port Melville Submission- Department of the Environment
A Fish in the Boat is Worth Five in the Shop.
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 11:35 pm
- Location: Darwin
Re: Port Melville Submission- Department of the Environment
I am fully on board with what Tristan and Nomad has to say on the topic above. I also believe in organisations like AFANT. Who else will stand up for the average fisho ? Who on this forum attends all of the meetings stands up and has there say ? Be it right or wrong. Not many, I be thinking.
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 5766
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:29 pm
- Location: PALMERSTON
- Contact:
Re: Port Melville Submission- Department of the Environment
STANDY wrote:Should it proceed?
Already built
There is plenty that can be done if the govt was fair dinkum.
There was a nsw developer who cleared a heap of land, built an entire sub division incl roads, kerb and gutter etc etc without approval. The L&E court made him return the land back to its original status including replanting trees to the same size and type. Cost him mega bucks – but he didn’t get a prison term.
That sent a real message to the cowboys who thought they would just cop a fine.
The current govt here would probably give the Tiwi bloke a grant and a pat on the back.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 3 Replies
- 976 Views
-
Last post by Matt Flynn
-
- 0 Replies
- 585 Views
-
Last post by Matt Flynn
-
- 0 Replies
- 624 Views
-
Last post by tristan.sloan
-
- 0 Replies
- 608 Views
-
Last post by tristan.sloan
-
- 0 Replies
- 554 Views
-
Last post by tristan.sloan