Through hull Transducer
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Through hull Transducer
Howdy FFFers,
Was helping a mate on the w/end and we were looking to put the transducer inside the hull. Has anyone done this with good success?
We filled the bottom of the hull with a couple of litres of water to give it a good medium to shoot through but were still getting a lot of feedback from the hull. It worked perfectly when we just dropped it over the side.
Bit of background info - boat is 14.5m maybe 7/8mm thick and has just been antifouled and we were using a Lowrance x5 colour sounder. Dropped the Hz to 87 as 200 wouldn't work.
If we got it working with the water we were going to use a huge glob of silicon as the medium and also to glue it in place. I have used this with good success on my little car topper so it wouldn't get knocked off while transporting.
Any of you technical types out there have any other solutions it would be greatly appreciated.
We are trying to avoid putting a new hole in the hull if possible.
Cheers
Shawn
Was helping a mate on the w/end and we were looking to put the transducer inside the hull. Has anyone done this with good success?
We filled the bottom of the hull with a couple of litres of water to give it a good medium to shoot through but were still getting a lot of feedback from the hull. It worked perfectly when we just dropped it over the side.
Bit of background info - boat is 14.5m maybe 7/8mm thick and has just been antifouled and we were using a Lowrance x5 colour sounder. Dropped the Hz to 87 as 200 wouldn't work.
If we got it working with the water we were going to use a huge glob of silicon as the medium and also to glue it in place. I have used this with good success on my little car topper so it wouldn't get knocked off while transporting.
Any of you technical types out there have any other solutions it would be greatly appreciated.
We are trying to avoid putting a new hole in the hull if possible.
Cheers
Shawn
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
-
- Seadog
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 2:25 pm
- Location: Gove
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
Pretty sure you will need a thru hull transducer
- dannett
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 10:37 am
Re: Through hull Transducer
How about welding a tab on the back of the transom and mounting it through that? I have seen a few about and I have a similar setup that works very well.
Dan
Dan
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
We looked at adding a tab to the back but its a tri hull boat with twins on the back and we think that there will be too much wash and interference with the shape of the hull. Additionally it is now back on the water so welding is going to be hard without putting it back on the hardstand. May have to "dry dock" it on a sandbar for any mods to underside of the hull including a through hull transducer.
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
- dannett
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 1192
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 10:37 am
Re: Through hull Transducer
Air bubbles are the enemy of a good return signal. Provided the transducer stays wet and free of air bubbles you should not have a problem. Fixing to the pods or jacking plates where forward of the outboards should not cause you a problem. The install manual recommends this location.
If it helps at all this is how mine is setup and I now get good returns to 60 km/h. Dan
If it helps at all this is how mine is setup and I now get good returns to 60 km/h. Dan
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:23 pm
- Contact:
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
Aluminium
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
- kavera
- Silver Member
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 11:06 am
Re: Through hull Transducer
i don't think ally is the best option for a thru hull.... I've mounted one in a plastic kayak using selleys all clear, putting a big blob and making sure theres no bubbles. Gently sit it in the silicone but try not to create any air pockets between transducer and silicone..
at the end of the day you can try it without extra holes ( just run the cables to it) and test it out... if it works, great. If not it'll only cost you the price of the silicone.
From the install too just make sure you do it level
at the end of the day you can try it without extra holes ( just run the cables to it) and test it out... if it works, great. If not it'll only cost you the price of the silicone.
From the install too just make sure you do it level
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
There are going to be pretty big losses in signal trying to fire through metal. Double losses as the signal has to go out and then return.
I've put a transducer inside an aluminium hull before but it was only for ascertaining depth. Bedding it into a big glob of silicon straight onto the aluminium. Too many losses to get any helpful detail. 7 - 8 mm aluminium is pretty lossy!
Firing through fibreglass is ok as the losses are much less.
If you insist on firing through aluminium then you need to get a much more powerful sounder to try to make up for the losses.
My advice is don't unless its simply for depth (and shallow at that).
I'd put the boat on the hardstand, cut a square hole and make up a little box with the transducer head level with the bottom of box flush with level of hull.. Silicone it in from the bottom.
Then you'll have a sounder that works properly, doesn't protrude, maintains the integrity of the hull.
I've put a transducer inside an aluminium hull before but it was only for ascertaining depth. Bedding it into a big glob of silicon straight onto the aluminium. Too many losses to get any helpful detail. 7 - 8 mm aluminium is pretty lossy!
Firing through fibreglass is ok as the losses are much less.
If you insist on firing through aluminium then you need to get a much more powerful sounder to try to make up for the losses.
My advice is don't unless its simply for depth (and shallow at that).
I'd put the boat on the hardstand, cut a square hole and make up a little box with the transducer head level with the bottom of box flush with level of hull.. Silicone it in from the bottom.
Then you'll have a sounder that works properly, doesn't protrude, maintains the integrity of the hull.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Regards
Ronje
Ronje
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
Thanks for your input fellas, will have another look at the boat on the weekend
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
ronje wrote:There are going to be pretty big losses in signal trying to fire through metal. Double losses as the signal has to go out and then return.
I've put a transducer inside an aluminium hull before but it was only for ascertaining depth. Bedding it into a big glob of silicon straight onto the aluminium. Too many losses to get any helpful detail. 7 - 8 mm aluminium is pretty lossy!
Firing through fibreglass is ok as the losses are much less.
If you insist on firing through aluminium then you need to get a much more powerful sounder to try to make up for the losses.
My advice is don't unless its simply for depth (and shallow at that).
I'd put the boat on the hardstand, cut a square hole and make up a little box with the transducer head level with the bottom of box flush with level of hull.. Silicone it in from the bottom.
Then you'll have a sounder that works properly, doesn't protrude, maintains the integrity of the hull.
Do you get much interference from turbulence from the hole in the bottom?
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
No
You fill the gap with silastic and smooth it across the face of the transducer so the face is exactly level with the hull. No turbulence on the face then
If its a round transducer get a bit of aluminium pipe of the sufficient diametre to take the transducer and cut a suitable size round hole to suit the pipe. Weld the pipe butt end onto the hull so the pipe extends up into bilge. Measure the distance from the face of the transducer to the sealing ring on the transducer shaft. Cut the pipe at that point and then weld a bit of flat aluminium across the bilge end of the pipe. Cut a mounting hole to fit the transducer in the pipe.
Basically all you've done is shift the through hull transducer mounting hole up into the bilge and the transducer face then mounts flush with the hull.
I'll get a pix of one for you.
You fill the gap with silastic and smooth it across the face of the transducer so the face is exactly level with the hull. No turbulence on the face then
If its a round transducer get a bit of aluminium pipe of the sufficient diametre to take the transducer and cut a suitable size round hole to suit the pipe. Weld the pipe butt end onto the hull so the pipe extends up into bilge. Measure the distance from the face of the transducer to the sealing ring on the transducer shaft. Cut the pipe at that point and then weld a bit of flat aluminium across the bilge end of the pipe. Cut a mounting hole to fit the transducer in the pipe.
Basically all you've done is shift the through hull transducer mounting hole up into the bilge and the transducer face then mounts flush with the hull.
I'll get a pix of one for you.
Last edited by ronje on Thu Nov 27, 2014 7:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regards
Ronje
Ronje
- Finatic2
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 572
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
Thanks for taking to time to explain it Ronje, much appreciated
Fish stories told here....some true !!!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
When in doubt...exaggerate !!
-
- Jedi Seadog
- Posts: 2450
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 5:23 pm
- Contact:
Re: Through hull Transducer
Try this.
http://www.bertram31.com/proj/tips/in_hull_ducer.htm
2 things about how this fella went about it.
Firstly the size and shape of the box he built corresponds with the size and shape of the transducer he wanted to use.
Secondly he used a fibreglass box. He must have had a fibreglass hull.
Make your box (if you decide to go ahead) out of aluminium and weld it into the corresponding shaped hole that you make in the hull. Al comes in enough shapes and sizes (round pipe, square or oblong cross-section) to find exactly what you want.
I'd use a "puck" style transducer (shaped like a ice hockey puck) of right freqs for sounder. Airmar from USA are big noise in transducers.
Also think about what u might need in the future eg a transducer broadband enough to fully use the advantages of CHIRP technology.
Be interested to see how it pans out if you go ahead.
http://www.bertram31.com/proj/tips/in_hull_ducer.htm
2 things about how this fella went about it.
Firstly the size and shape of the box he built corresponds with the size and shape of the transducer he wanted to use.
Secondly he used a fibreglass box. He must have had a fibreglass hull.
Make your box (if you decide to go ahead) out of aluminium and weld it into the corresponding shaped hole that you make in the hull. Al comes in enough shapes and sizes (round pipe, square or oblong cross-section) to find exactly what you want.
I'd use a "puck" style transducer (shaped like a ice hockey puck) of right freqs for sounder. Airmar from USA are big noise in transducers.
Also think about what u might need in the future eg a transducer broadband enough to fully use the advantages of CHIRP technology.
Be interested to see how it pans out if you go ahead.
Regards
Ronje
Ronje
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 0 Replies
- 782 Views
-
Last post by googz
-
- 11 Replies
- 2065 Views
-
Last post by pelletouse
-
- 2 Replies
- 355 Views
-
Last post by Matt Flynn
-
- 1 Replies
- 877 Views
-
Last post by jeffish
-
- 5 Replies
- 1096 Views
-
Last post by craig.g